Reflections
Reflections on Self-Directed Learning (SDL) in general
In general, SDL is the best thing that has happened as a result of the creation of the internet. The content and subject matter are seemingly endless. Anyone with a growth mindset and an internet connection can train a pet, learn about philosophical ideas, fix a washing machine or build a website. SDL utilizes adult learners’ natural propensity to be Problem-Based Learners (Kurt 2020)
What a wonderful world we live in.
The challenge is to have the necessary skills to properly assess the training in terms of adequacy to solve the problem presented by the learner.
The instruction needs to be:
- Specific to the task or problem to be learned
- The instruction quality needs to be adequate to achieve one’s requirements.
- The technology needs to work and be understood
The learner also needs to be active.
One can not discuss self-directed learning without mentioning Knowles’s Andragogy and later Garrison’s Self-Directed Learning (SDL). In general, their theories indicate that learners need to set goals, find resources, create, plan and evaluate their own results. To do this, the learner is best to be self-motivated and use technology well. (Valamis, 2022)
It is essential to analyze if the training meets your needs. It doesn’t take long to go down the proverbial rabbit hole looking for the specific teachings for the issue that requires solving. Alternatively, if one can’t find the exact training they need, the learner needs to seek out generalized training that can be adapted to their needs. This, inevitably, is the issue with SDL. It has been my experience that most SDL training is behaviouristic in its approach to instruction. The training typically follows Skinners Operant Conditioning: doing this will create this positive result; don’t do this, you will not get the desired results. (Culatta 2022) With this type of instruction, if one’s goals do not precisely match the training provided, the learner may not gain the required outcomes they had set for themselves. If one spends the time upfront to research the training or if it’s complicated, multiple training that best suit the requirements of the learner.
Reflections on Carri Dils Build a Site with WordPress (2022)
The behaviouristic approach that Dils took was excellent in teaching the basics of WordPress. Dils utilizes Vygotsky’s scaffolding methods setting small manageable steps in order to provide the desired website outcome. (Serhat, 2020) Had I stuck to the course, I would have a fully functioning website, but it would not have met my needs. Consequently, I deviated from the course without the knowledge to fully implement the site’s goals.
The course developed my knowledge as advertised. I am comfortable with my ability to do the essential skills. But there are a few disconnects. I have not mastered WordPress. If we place my learning into the illustration below by Serhat (2022) of Vygotsky’s construct of the Zone of Proximal Development, my knowledge level is clearly in the middle

There is a disconnect between what I want to do and what I have learned to do. I am in the Zone of Proximal Development. At this point, my constructivist friends Piaget, Vygotsky, Bandura, and Dewey, would suggest that I need some social interaction. I would agree with them as I need to find a mentor, teacher or knowledgeable friend to assist in achieving the last few pieces to achieve my goal.





